United States v. Harris

92 F. App'x 964

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Harris appeals the district court’s orders denying his “Motion for Downward Departure and/or Relief from Sentencing Enhancements Through Reconsideration of a Sentence of Imprisonment” and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Harris, No. CR-93-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 4, 2003 & Sept. 2, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED