United States v. Harmon

667 F. App'x 64
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2016·No. No. 16-6413·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Devon Harmon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the reeord and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Harmon, No. 1:14-cr-00017-1 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harmon, 667 F. App'x 64 (4th Cir. 2016).

667 F. App'x 64 (United States v. Harmon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related