United States v. Hargrove

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Hargrove

582 F. App'x 200

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2014·No. No. 14-6314·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Terrell Anthony Hargrove appeals the district court’s order denying his motion, brought under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32, to correct errors in his presentence report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hargrove, No. 3:06-cr-00026-JAG-1 (E.D.Va. Feb. 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Terrell Anthony Hargrove appeals the district court’s order denying his motion, brought under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32, to correct errors in his presentence report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hargrove, No. 3:06-cr-00026-JAG-1 (E.D.Va. Feb. 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Hargrove, 582 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

582 F. App'x 200 (United States v. Hargrove) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related