United States v. Hargrave

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6289

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

VICTOR WILLIAM HARGRAVE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (4:95-cr-00186-JAB-1)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor William Hargrave, Appellant Pro Se. L. Patrick Auld, Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Victor William Hargrave appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Hargrave, No.

4:95-cr-00186-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2011). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED