United States v. Hannah

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2009·No. 09-6110·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6110

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

EDMOND LOWELL HANNAH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston, District Judge. (5:94-cr-00010-1)

Submitted: August 6, 2009 Decided: August 25, 2009

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edmond Lowell Hannah, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Edmond Lowell Hannah appeals the district court’s

orders: granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and

reducing his sentence to 240 months; and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motions for

appointment of counsel and summary judgment and affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hannah,

No. 5:94-cr-00010-1 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 5, 2009 & Jan. 16, 2009).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hannah, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Hannah (United States v. Hannah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related