United States v. Hanna
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7155
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KENNETH JAMES HANNA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (4:95-cr-00007-CMC-1)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth James Hanna, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kenneth James Hanna appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), the court’s subsequent order granting
his motion for reconsideration, granting his § 3582(c) motion,
and reducing his sentence, and the court’s order denying his
second motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hanna,
No. 4:95-cr-00007-CMC-1 (D.S.C. June 23, 2008; July 17, 2008;
Sept. 9, 2008). See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th
Cir. 2009). We deny Hanna’s motion to remand and his motion for
stay. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Hanna (United States v. Hanna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.