United States v. Hanna

158 F. App'x 454
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2005·No. No. 05-7479·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth J. Hanna appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hanna, No. CR-95-7 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 7, 2005 & entered Sept. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hanna, 158 F. App'x 454 (4th Cir. 2005).

158 F. App'x 454 (United States v. Hanna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related