United States v. Hammock

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Hammock

332 F. App'x 606

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 9, 2009·No. No. 09-11672·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

D. Nicole Williams, appointed counsel for Kenny Hammock in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Hammock’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

D. Nicole Williams, appointed counsel for Kenny Hammock in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Hammock’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Hammock, 332 F. App'x 606 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

332 F. App'x 606 (United States v. Hammock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related