United States v. Gyamfi

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gyamfi. Read the opinion of the Court — 408 F. App'x 669
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 21, 2011·No. 10-7561·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7561

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANIEL GYAMFI, a/k/a Nana, a/k/a Krateman,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cr-00298-JCC-1)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 21, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Gyamfi, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Daniel Gyamfi appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a downward departure. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gyamfi, (4th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Gyamfi (United States v. Gyamfi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.