United States v. Gyamfi
This text of United States v. Gyamfi (United States v. Gyamfi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7561
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DANIEL GYAMFI, a/k/a Nana, a/k/a Krateman,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cr-00298-JCC-1)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 21, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Gyamfi, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Daniel Gyamfi appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a downward departure. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Gyamfi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gyamfi-ca4-2011.