United States v. Gyamfi

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Gyamfi

408 F. App'x 669

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 21, 2011·No. No. 10-7561·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Gyamfi appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a downward departure. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [670]*670the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Gyamfi appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a downward departure. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [670]*670the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Gyamfi, 408 F. App'x 669 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

408 F. App'x 669 (United States v. Gyamfi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related