United States v. Gyamfi

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 2011
Docket10-7561
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Gyamfi (United States v. Gyamfi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gyamfi, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7561

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANIEL GYAMFI, a/k/a Nana, a/k/a Krateman,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cr-00298-JCC-1)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 21, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Gyamfi, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Daniel Gyamfi appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a downward departure. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Gyamfi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gyamfi-ca4-2011.