United States v. Gwynn

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Gwynn

475 F. App'x 941

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 21, 2012·No. No. 12-7088·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donte Gwynn appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error, given that Gwynn is ineligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Gwynn, No. 4:07-cr-00112-RGD-FBS-5 (E.D. Va. June 12, 2012). We dispense [942] with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donte Gwynn appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error, given that Gwynn is ineligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Gwynn, No. 4:07-cr-00112-RGD-FBS-5 (E.D. Va. June 12, 2012). We dispense [942] with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Gwynn, 475 F. App'x 941 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

475 F. App'x 941 (United States v. Gwynn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related