United States v. Guevara-Sosa

175 F. App'x 684
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 12, 2006
Docket05-40387
StatusUnpublished

This text of 175 F. App'x 684 (United States v. Guevara-Sosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Guevara-Sosa, 175 F. App'x 684 (5th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40387 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE ORLANDO GUEVARA-SOSA,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-1505-ALL --------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Orlando Guevara-Sosa appeals his conviction for illegal

reentry. His constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224,

235 (1998). Although Guevara-Sosa contends that Almendarez-

Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme

Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such

arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 05-40387 -2-

See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Guevara-Sosa properly

concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of

Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to

preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Almendarez-Torres v. United States
523 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 1998)
Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Oscar Garza-Lopez
410 F.3d 268 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 F. App'x 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-guevara-sosa-ca5-2006.