United States v. GRIGGERS

District Court, M.D. Georgia·Decided September 17, 2025·No. 5:22-cv-00310·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:22-cv-310 (MTT) ) RAY E. GRIGGERS II, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER In accordance with the Court’s final judgment (ECF 153), the United States moves for a “Decree of Foreclosure and Order of Sale” of property located at 531 Greenwood Street, Barnesville, GA 30204 (“the Greenwood Property”), belonging to Defendant Ray E. Griggers II. ECF 154. Griggers objects to the United States’ motion, arguing it is premature. ECF 156. Griggers does not otherwise object to the United States’ proposed terms of sale. See id. For the following reasons, the United States’ motion is GRANTED. DISCUSSION On August 1, 2025, the Court entered final judgment in this case establishing, among other things, that 1) Griggers owes unpaid federal income taxes for tax years 2002–2004, 2009, 2015, and 2017, and 2) the United States has valid and enforceable tax liens on all Griggers’ property and rights to property, including his interest in the Greenwood Property. ECF 153 at 2. In addition, the Court instructed that “[t]he United States may enforce its federal tax liens by moving for a judicial sale of the Greenwood Property upon permission of this Court,” as the United States now seeks to do. Id. at 3. Griggers objects that the United States’ motion is premature. ECF 156 at 2. He argues the United States may not move to foreclose on the Greenwood Property until

after the statutory windows for him to seek relief from final judgment or to appeal have passed.1 Id. Griggers also argues that the United States’ “premature” filing “demonstrates bad faith and disregard for the Defendant’s constitutional right of due process” and that granting the United States’ motion would deprive him of “any meaningful opportunity for judicial review.” Id. But the United States’ motion is timely. In an action to enforce a federal tax lien, 26 U.S.C. § 7403(c) provides: “The court shall, after the parties have been duly notified of the action, proceed to adjudicate all matters involved therein and finally determine the merits of all claims to and liens upon the property.” After doing so, “in all cases where a claim or interest of the United States therein is established, [the court] may decree a

sale of such property.” Id. Here, the United States has an established interest in the Greenwood Property. ECF 156. Thus, consistent with the natural progression of an action brought under 26 U.S.C. § 7403, the Court now “may decree sale” of the Greenwood Property. Id. The Court also notes that decreeing sale may be necessary to conclude this case. A “final decision is one that ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment.” Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC v. 3.921 Acres

1 Specifically, Griggers argues the United States may not move for a foreclosure decree until after the deadlines set forth in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60(b) and set forth in Rule 4(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure have passed. of Land in Lake Cnty., 947 F.3d 1362, 1370 (11th Cir. 2020) (citation modified); see also United States v. Lena, 370 F. App'x 65, 68 (11th Cir. 2010) (explaining the Eleventh Circuit dismissed as “neither final nor immediately appealable” an appeal from a “final judgment as to the tax assessments, court costs, and attorney’s fees” which included an

instruction “that the government could foreclose” on the defendants’ home). Here, the Court’s final judgment leaves something beyond executing judgment “for the court to do.” Namely, the Court must establish the foreclosure decree’s substantive terms before executing judgment according to those terms. See United States v. Allahyari, 99 F.4th 486, 493–94 (9th Cir. 2024) (“the lack of a final decision is confirmed by the absence of any order specifying the necessary substantive requirements governing how the sale should be conducted and the proceeds distributed.”). Thus, a decree of sale at this juncture, rather than depriving Griggers of meaningful access to the judicial process, may provide the final judgment he needs for an appeal. In sum, the United States’ motion for a decree of foreclosure is timely and does

not demonstrate bad faith or disregard for Griggers’ right to due process. To the extent Griggers wishes to stay enforcement of this foreclosure decree, he should move to do so. Accordingly, the United States’ motion for decree of sale (ECF 154) is GRANTED. DECREE OF FORECLOSURE AND ORDER OF SALE For good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. The United States is authorized to foreclose the federal tax liens associated with the unpaid federal income tax liabilities of Defendant Ray E. Griggers, II. 2. The real property in this action, located at 531 Greenwood Street, Barnesville, GA 30204, (“the Property”) in Lamar County, Georgia within the Middle District of Georgia, is ordered sold pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 7402(a), 7403 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2001 and 2002. The Property is legally described as: All that tract or parcel of land lying and being in the City of Barnesville, Lamar County, Georgia, on Greenwood Street and numbered as No. 531, fronting 95 feet on the west side of said street with a southern boundary line of 162 feet, a northern boundary line of 163 feet and a western boundary line of 95 feet; said real property is bounded, now or formerly, as follows: on the South by the property of Leula Stock Brooks; on the West by property of Arnice Fambro; on the North by property of Searcy Murray Realty and on the East by Greenwood Street

3. The Internal Revenue Service Property Appraisal and Liquidation Specialists (“PALS”) is authorized to offer for public sale and to sell the Property. 4. Terms and Conditions: The terms and conditions of the sale are as follows: a. The sale shall be free and clear of all rights, titles, claims, liens and interests of all parties to this action, including the United States and Defendant Ray E. Griggers, II and any successors in interest or transferees of those parties; b. The sale shall be subject to building lines, if established, all laws, ordinances, and governmental regulations (including building and zoning ordinances) affecting the Property, and easements and restrictions of record, if any; Sale Location c. The sale of the Property shall be by public auction under mail-in bid, proxy bid, at the Courthouse of Lamar County, Georgia, or on the Property’s premises. Open of mail in bid forms will occur at the PALS office location. Notice of Sale d. The PALS shall announce the date and time for the sale; e. Notice of the sale shall be published once a week for at least four consecutive weeks before the sale in at least one newspaper regularly issued and of general circulation in Lamar County, Georgia and by any other notice PALS deems appropriate. The notice shall contain an adequate

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. GRIGGERS, (M.D. Ga. 2025).

United States v. GRIGGERS (United States v. GRIGGERS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Evangelos Lena
370 F. App'x 65 (Eleventh Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Shaun Allahyari
99 F.4th 486 (Ninth Circuit, 2024)