United States v. Gresham

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2010·No. 10-6992·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6992

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TEERAN TYRON GRESHAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:03-cr-00064-F-1)

Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 22, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Teeran Tyron Gresham, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Teeran Tyron Gresham appeals the district court’s

order denying his “Motion to Recall” the court’s June 2, 2009

order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Gresham, No. 7:03-cr-00064-F-1

(E.D.N.C. June 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gresham, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Gresham (United States v. Gresham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.