United States v. Gresham

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Gresham

398 F. App'x 907

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2010·No. No. 10-6992·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Teeran Tyron Gresham appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Recall” the court’s June 2, 2009 order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gresham, No. 7:03-cr-00064-F-l, 2010 WL 2632019 (E.D.N.C. June 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Teeran Tyron Gresham appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Recall” the court’s June 2, 2009 order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gresham, No. 7:03-cr-00064-F-l, 2010 WL 2632019 (E.D.N.C. June 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Gresham, 398 F. App'x 907 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

398 F. App'x 907 (United States v. Gresham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.