United States v. Green

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 246 F.3d 433
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2000·No. 00-10343·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-10343 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BETTY JEAN GREEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CR-251-1 --------------------- September 5, 2000

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Betty Jean Green has filed a motion

to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Green was sent a copy of counsel’s motion and brief,

but she has not filed a response. Our review of the brief filed by

counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous point for

appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Green, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Green (United States v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)