United States v. Green

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 246 F.3d 433
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 19, 2000·No. 99-60409·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-60409 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROY GREEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No.4:93-CR-133-B-O -------------------- June 15, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roy Green, federal prisoner # 09940-042, has filed a motion

to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in the appeal of the denial of

his motion to correct his sentence, brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3742(a). That statute does not authorize a postconviction

motion challenging conviction and sentence. Green has failed to

raise any nonfrivolous issues for appeal. See United States v.

Boutwell, 896 F.2d 884, 889-90 (5th Cir. 1990)(one-judge order).

Accordingly, his motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-60409 -2-

Because Green’s appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Green, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Green (United States v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related