United States v. Green

341 F. App'x 895
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 260 F. App'x 550
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2009·No. No. 09-7012·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Bernard Green appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. Green argued that his sentence should be reduced in light of Amendment 706 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have previously addressed and rejected the issue now raised by Green. United States v. Green, 301 Fed.Appx. 201 (4th Cir.2008) (per curiam). Thus, this court’s prior holding is law of the ease, and Green may not relitigate that issue in this appeal. See United States v. Aramony, 166 F.3d 655, 661 (4th Cir.1999). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order for that reason. United States v. Green, No. 7:99-cr-00032-jct-1, 2009 WL 1405525 (W.D.Va. May 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Green, 341 F. App'x 895 (4th Cir. 2009).

341 F. App'x 895 (United States v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Green
301 F. App'x 201 (Fourth Circuit, 2008)