United States v. Green

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 260 F. App'x 550
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2009·No. 09-6316·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6316

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALTON KENT GREEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:00-cr-00046-H-1)

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 30, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alton Kent Green, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Alton Kent Green appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the

district court. United States v. Green, No. 4:00-cr-00046-H-1

(E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2009). We deny Green’s motion for

appointment of counsel and his motion to place this case in

abeyance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Green, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Green (United States v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related