United States v. Green
This text of United States v. Green (United States v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7106
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RODRIGUEZ SHAWN GREEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:05-cr-00904-RBH-2)
Submitted: February 2, 2009 Decided: February 10, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodriguez Shawn Green, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Rodriguez Shawn Green appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for sentence modification. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Green, No. 4:05-cr-00904-RBH-2 (D.S.C. June 16, 2008).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Green, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-green-ca4-2009.