United States v. Gray

304 F. App'x 164

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Roy W. Gray appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gray, No. 3:99-cr-00086-nkm-1 (W.D.Va. Aug. 4, 2008).

We deny Gray’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.