United States v. Graves

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Graves

638 F. App'x 245

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 16, 2016·No. No. 15-7455·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert James Graves appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we giant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Graves, No. 4:99-cr-70049-NKM-RSB-1 (W.D.Va. Aug. 31, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert James Graves appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we giant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Graves, No. 4:99-cr-70049-NKM-RSB-1 (W.D.Va. Aug. 31, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Graves, 638 F. App'x 245 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

638 F. App'x 245 (United States v. Graves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related