United States v. Grant

United States Court of Military Appeals

United States v. Grant

20 C.M.A. 187, 20 USCMA 187, 43 C.M.R. 27, 1970 CMA LEXIS 676, 1970 WL 7421

CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals

DecidedDecember 4, 1970

DocketNo. 23,471

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 C.M.A. 187 (United States v. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Grant, 20 C.M.A. 187, 20 USCMA 187, 43 C.M.R. 27, 1970 CMA LEXIS 676, 1970 WL 7421 (cma 1970).

Pincite

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

Failure of the military judge to interrogate the appellant on the record to determine, in compliance with paragraph 53d(2)(&), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition), that Grant’s request for trial by a military judge alone was “understandingly made” is not reversible error for the reasons stated in United States v Jenkins, 20 USCMA 112, 42 CMR 304 (1970), and United States v Turner, 20 USCMA 167, 43 CMR 7 (1970).

The decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI