United States v. Grant

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6520

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM NATHANIEL GRANT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (3:92-cr-00036-sgw)

Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: July 16, 2008

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Nathaniel Grant, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Nathaniel Grant appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Grant, No. 3:92-cr-00036-sgw

(W.D. Va. Mar. 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

-2-