United States v. Gouveia

464 U.S. 1035, 104 S. Ct. 693, 79 L. Ed. 2d 160, 52 U.S.L.W. 3509, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 495
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gouveia. Read the opinion of the Court — 467 U.S. 180
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 9, 1984·No. No. 83-128·Published

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 913.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Joseph F. Walsh, Esquire, of Los Angeles, Cal., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Robert Ramirez in this case. Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Joel Levine, Esquire, of Los Angeles, Cal., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Philip Segura in this case. Motion of respondent William Gouveia for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Michael J. Treman, Esquire, of Santa Barbara, Cal., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent William Gouveia in this case. Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Charles P. Diamond, Esquire, of Los Angeles, Cal, be appointed to serve as counsel for respondents Robert E. Mills and Richard Raymond Pierce in this case. Motion of respondents Robert [1036]*1036E. Mills and Richard Raymond Pierce for divided argument granted. Motion of respondents William Gouveia et al. for divided argument denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gouveia, 464 U.S. 1035, 104 S. Ct. 693, 79 L. Ed. 2d 160, 52 U.S.L.W. 3509, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 495 (1984).

464 U.S. 1035 (United States v. Gouveia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.