United States v. Gouveia

Supreme Court

United States v. Gouveia

464 U.S. 1035, 104 S. Ct. 693, 79 L. Ed. 2d 160, 52 U.S.L.W. 3509, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 495

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 9, 1984

DocketNo. 83-128

StatusPublished

This text of 464 U.S. 1035 (United States v. Gouveia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Gouveia, 464 U.S. 1035, 104 S. Ct. 693, 79 L. Ed. 2d 160, 52 U.S.L.W. 3509, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 495 (1984).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 913.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Joseph F. Walsh, Esquire, of Los Angeles, Cal., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Robert Ramirez in this case. Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Joel Levine, Esquire, of Los Angeles, Cal., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Philip Segura in this case. Motion of respondent William Gouveia for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Michael J. Treman, Esquire, of Santa Barbara, Cal., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent William Gouveia in this case. Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Charles P. Diamond, Esquire, of Los Angeles, Cal, be appointed to serve as counsel for respondents Robert E. Mills and Richard Raymond Pierce in this case. Motion of respondents Robert [1036]*1036E. Mills and Richard Raymond Pierce for divided argument granted. Motion of respondents William Gouveia et al. for divided argument denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 913.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Joseph F. Walsh, Esquire, of Los Angeles, Cal., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Robert Ramirez in this case. Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Joel Levine, Esquire, of Los Angeles, Cal., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Philip Segura in this case. Motion of respondent William Gouveia for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Michael J. Treman, Esquire, of Santa Barbara, Cal., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent William Gouveia in this case. Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Charles P. Diamond, Esquire, of Los Angeles, Cal, be appointed to serve as counsel for respondents Robert E. Mills and Richard Raymond Pierce in this case. Motion of respondents Robert [1036]*1036E. Mills and Richard Raymond Pierce for divided argument granted. Motion of respondents William Gouveia et al. for divided argument denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

464 U.S. 1035, 104 S. Ct. 693, 79 L. Ed. 2d 160, 52 U.S.L.W. 3509, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gouveia-scotus-1984.