United States v. Gore

473 F. App'x 297
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 31, 2012
DocketNo. 12-6516
StatusPublished

This text of 473 F. App'x 297 (United States v. Gore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gore, 473 F. App'x 297 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Lee Gore appeals a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We affirm. Because the amendment in question did not lower Gore’s Guidelines sentence, we find the district did not abuse its discretion denying the motion. United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the dis[298]*298trict court’s order. We note that the record clearly shows that Gore’s Guidelines sentence was based upon his admission that he was responsible for 141 kilograms of powder cocaine and not on a quantity of crack cocaine. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Anthony Goines
357 F.3d 469 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 F. App'x 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gore-ca4-2012.