United States v. Goodman
70 M.J. 130, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 403
This text of 70 M.J. 130 (United States v. Goodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Goodman, 70 M.J. 130, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 403 (Ark. 2011).
Opinion
CCA 20090083. Review granted on the following issues:
I. WHETHER APPELLANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY TO FAILURE TO OBEY A GENERAL REGULATION (CHARGE I) WAS IMPROVIDENT BECAUSE THE MILITARY JUDGE FAILED TO SECURE A DISCLAIMER OF THE MISTAKE OF FACT DEFENSE WHEN IT WAS RAISED DURING THE PROVIDENCE INQUIRY.
II. WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER, AND JONES.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25 on Issue I only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
70 M.J. 130, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-goodman-armfor-2011.