United States v. Gonzalez-Morales

160 F. App'x 376
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 22, 2005
Docket05-50393
StatusUnpublished

This text of 160 F. App'x 376 (United States v. Gonzalez-Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gonzalez-Morales, 160 F. App'x 376 (5th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Jaime Gonzalez-Morales appeals his guilty-plea conviction for transporting illegal aliens. For the first time on appeal, he claims the factual basis for his guilty plea was insufficient because it failed to state he was aware of the status of the aliens he was transporting. Pursuant to our plain error standard of review, he fails to show the requisite “clear” or “obvious” error because he has not shown it was clear or obvious the factual basis was insufficient to demonstrate that he committed the charged crime. United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 731-37, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993); United States v. Johnson, 546 F.2d 1225, 1226 (5th Cir. 1977).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Olano
507 U.S. 725 (Supreme Court, 1993)
United States v. Francis Alvin Johnson
546 F.2d 1225 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 F. App'x 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gonzalez-morales-ca5-2005.