United States v. Gonzalez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 29, 2024·No. 23-1138·Unpublished

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 29 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1138 D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00567-RGK-2 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CESAR MUNOZ GONZALEZ, AKA Blanco, AKA "B",

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Cesar Munoz Gonzalez appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying

his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 799 (9th Cir. 2021), we affirm.

Gonzalez contends that the district court erred by failing to recognize its

authority to reduce his sentence even if it did not grant him immediate release.

The record demonstrates that the district court adequately responded to the

arguments Gonzalez presented and does not suggest the court misunderstood the

scope of its discretion under § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). See Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S.

639, 653 (1990) (“Trial judges are presumed to know the law and to apply it in

making their decisions.”), overruled on other grounds by Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S.

584, 609 (2002). Moreover, the district court did not abuse its discretion by

concluding that Gonzalez had not demonstrated extraordinary and compelling

reasons for relief. See United States v. Robertson, 895 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir.

2018) (a district court abuses its discretion only if its decision is illogical,

implausible, or without support in the record).

AFFIRMED.

2 23-1138

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gonzalez, (9th Cir. 2024).

United States v. Gonzalez (United States v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walton v. Arizona
497 U.S. 639 (Supreme Court, 1990)
Ring v. Arizona
536 U.S. 584 (Supreme Court, 2002)
United States v. Denise Robertson
895 F.3d 1206 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)
United States v. Patricia Aruda
993 F.3d 797 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)