Home/Ninth Circuit/United States v. Gonzalez

United States v. Gonzalez

598 F.3d 1095, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5365
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 16, 2010·No. 06-75426·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinions

Concurrence by Judge B. FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge BEA.

[1096]*1096ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing. Judges Paez and N.R. Smith have voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and Judge B. Fletcher has so recommended.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to hear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. See Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gonzalez, 598 F.3d 1095, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5365 (9th Cir. 2010).

598 F.3d 1095 (United States v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Steve Pritchard
964 F.3d 513 (Sixth Circuit, 2020)
State v. Little
2014 Ohio 4871 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
State v. Clark
2014 Ohio 4873 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
United States v. Jonathan Thomas
726 F.3d 1086 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
State v. Harris
58 So. 3d 408 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
United States v. Buford
632 F.3d 264 (Sixth Circuit, 2011)
Deemer v. State
244 P.3d 69 (Court of Appeals of Alaska, 2010)
State v. Daniel
242 P.3d 1186 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2010)
United States v. Amos
733 F. Supp. 2d 907 (E.D. Tennessee, 2010)
State v. Frederick
236 P.3d 1269 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2010)
People v. McCarty
229 P.3d 1041 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2010)
United States v. Shelton
374 F. App'x 736 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Gonzalez
598 F.3d 1095 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)