United States v. Gomez
This text of 430 F. App'x 234 (United States v. Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lino Zepeda Gomez appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) based on Amendment 709. Because this amendment is not expressly listed in U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10(c) (2010), the district court lacked authority to apply the amendment retroactively. See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 249 n. 2 (4th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Gomez, No. 7:01-cr-00069-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
430 F. App'x 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gomez-ca4-2011.