United States v. Golson
This text of United States v. Golson (United States v. Golson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7229
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MALCOLM EUGENE GOLSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:01-cr-00047-RGD-1)
Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 21, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcolm Eugene Golson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Eugene Golson appeals a district court order
denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and
find no error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See United States v. Golson, No. 2:01-cr-
00047-RGD (E.D. Va. June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Golson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-golson-ca4-2008.