United States v. Golson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6095

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MALCOLM EUGENE GOLSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-01-47; CA-02-774)

Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: May 25, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Malcolm Eugene Golson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Eugene Golson appeals the district court’s order

and opinion denying his motion to compel the Government to file a

motion for a reduction in his sentence due to substantial

assistance. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

order and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See United

States v. Golson, Nos. CR-01-47, CA-02-774 (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 2005).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -