United States v. Golson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Golson

131 F. App'x 952

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 25, 2005·No. No. 05-6095·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Malcolm Eugene Golson appeals the district court’s order and opinion denying his motion to compel the Government to file a motion for a reduction in his sentence due to substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See United States v. Golson, Nos. CR-01-47, CA-02-774 (E.D.Va. Jan. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Malcolm Eugene Golson appeals the district court’s order and opinion denying his motion to compel the Government to file a motion for a reduction in his sentence due to substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See United States v. Golson, Nos. CR-01-47, CA-02-774 (E.D.Va. Jan. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Golson, 131 F. App'x 952 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

131 F. App'x 952 (United States v. Golson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.