United States v. Goins

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Goins

648 F. App'x 367

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 17, 2016·No. No. 16-6038·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Earl Goins appeals the district court’s . order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Goins, No. 4:12-cr-00669-RBH-3 (D.S.C. Dec. 29, 2015); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Earl Goins appeals the district court’s . order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Goins, No. 4:12-cr-00669-RBH-3 (D.S.C. Dec. 29, 2015); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Goins, 648 F. App'x 367 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

648 F. App'x 367 (United States v. Goins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related