United States v. Glenn

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Glenn. Read the opinion of the Court — 302 F. App'x 133
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 3, 2008·No. 08-7204·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7204

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

TERRANCE WAYNE GLENN,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (7:05-cr-01003-HMH-11)

Submitted: November 18, 2008 Decided: December 3, 2008

Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrance Wayne Glenn, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Terrance Wayne Glenn appeals the district court’s

order granting him a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Glenn, No. 7:05-cr-

01003-HMH-11 (D.S.C. July 3, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Glenn, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Glenn (United States v. Glenn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related