United States v. Gindraw

104 F. App'x 308

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael A. Gindraw seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion for summary judgment on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gindraw has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cock-rell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED