United States v. Gindraw

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 10, 2004
• Docket: 04-6738
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6738

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL A. GINDRAW,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CR-01-661; CA-03-2321)

Submitted: July 30, 2004 Decided: August 10, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Gindraw, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Gindraw seeks to appeal the district court’s

order granting the Government’s motion for summary judgment on his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Gindraw has not made a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -