United States v. Gilliam

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7580

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROY LEE GILLIAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-6034

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (2:90-cr-00007-GMW-1) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Lee Gilliam, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Roy Lee Gilliam appeals

the district court’s orders: (1) granting, in part, his motion for

modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000), denying his

motion for appointment of counsel, and denying a resentencing

hearing, and (2) denying his motion for bail pending appeal. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Gilliam, No. 2:90-cr-00007-GMW-1 (W.D. Va.

Sept. 26, 2007; filed Nov. 28, 2007 & entered Nov. 29, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -