United States v. Giles

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7144

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DINO MARCELLUS GILES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:94-cr-00212-WMN-1)

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 26, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dino Marcellus Giles, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Slaymaker Sale, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dino Marcellus Giles appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Giles, No. 1:94-cr-

00212-WMN-1 (D. Md. Aug. 7, 2008); see United States v. Hood,

556 F.3d 226, 235-36 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 321

(2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED