United States v. Gilbert

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6961

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL GILBERT, a/k/a Roy Smith, a/k/a Tracy,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:97-cr-00352-REP-2)

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 26, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Gilbert, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Gilbert appeals from the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gilbert,

No. 3:97-cr-00352-REP-2 (E.D. Va. May 6, 2009). We deny

Gilbert’s motion for copies of documents, and we dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED