United States v. German Espinoza Montero-Camargo, United States of America v. Lorenzo Sanchez-Guillen

192 F.3d 946, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10921, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8544, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 26912
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. German Espinoza Montero-Camargo, United States of America v. Lorenzo Sanchez-Guillen. Read the opinion of the Court — 208 F.3d 1122
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 25, 1999·No. 97-50643·Published

Opinion

192 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. 1999)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GERMAN ESPINOZA MONTERO-CAMARGO, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LORENZO SANCHEZ-GUILLEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 97-50643, No. 97-50645

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

October 25, 1999

D.C. No. CR 96-02233-1-IEG, D.C. No. CR 96-02233-2-IEG

Before: HUG, Chief Judge.

Order

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, United States v. Montero-Camargo, 177 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 1999), is withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. German Espinoza Montero-Camargo, United States of America v. Lorenzo Sanchez-Guillen, 192 F.3d 946, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10921, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8544, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 26912 (9th Cir. 1999).

192 F.3d 946 (United States v. German Espinoza Montero-Camargo, United States of America v. Lorenzo Sanchez-Guillen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Montero-Camargo
177 F.3d 1113 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Montero-Camargo
192 F.3d 946 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)