United States v. Gee

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: July 2, 2009
• Docket: 08-8381
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8381

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RICKY GEE,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:03-cr-00394-JRS-11)

Submitted: April 29, 2009 Decided: July 2, 2009

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Gee, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ricky Gee appeals the district court’s order granting

in part his motion for sentence modification under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we grant the Government’s motion

to seal its informal response brief and affirm the district

court’s order. United States v. Gee, No. 3:03-cr-00394-JRS-11

(E.D. Va. Oct. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED