United States v. Geanes

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 5, 2011·No. 10-7436·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7436

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KYRON WILLIAM GEANES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:04-cr-00425-LMB-1)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 5, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kyron William Geanes, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kyron Geanes appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a reduction in sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Geanes,

1:04-cr-00425-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2010). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Geanes, (4th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Geanes (United States v. Geanes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related