United States v. Gayle

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Gayle

311 F. App'x 651

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2009·No. No. 08-7620·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Gayle appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Gayle, No. 3:97-cr00085-jpj-l, 2008 WL 2954294 (W.D.Va. July 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Gayle appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Gayle, No. 3:97-cr00085-jpj-l, 2008 WL 2954294 (W.D.Va. July 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Gayle, 311 F. App'x 651 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

311 F. App'x 651 (United States v. Gayle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related