United States v. Garza
This text of 176 F. App'x 449 (United States v. Garza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Oscar Jaime Garza, federal prisoner #30078-180, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana. He argues that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by imposing a sentence based on the court’s findings that the offense involved more marijuana than he admitted in his factual basis and that he was a leader or organizer in the offense. He argues that his sentence should be vacated in view of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The district court granted a certificate of appealability on the issue “[wjhether the holding in Booker applies retroactively to a § 2255 collateral attack of a sentence.” We have now held that Booker is not retroactively applicable to an initial § 2255 motion. United States v. Gentry, 432 F.3d 600, 604-05 (5th Cir.2005). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *450 the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 F. App'x 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-garza-ca5-2006.