United States v. Garza

176 F. App'x 449
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 11, 2006
Docket05-50149
StatusUnpublished

This text of 176 F. App'x 449 (United States v. Garza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Garza, 176 F. App'x 449 (5th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Oscar Jaime Garza, federal prisoner #30078-180, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana. He argues that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by imposing a sentence based on the court’s findings that the offense involved more marijuana than he admitted in his factual basis and that he was a leader or organizer in the offense. He argues that his sentence should be vacated in view of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The district court granted a certificate of appealability on the issue “[wjhether the holding in Booker applies retroactively to a § 2255 collateral attack of a sentence.” We have now held that Booker is not retroactively applicable to an initial § 2255 motion. United States v. Gentry, 432 F.3d 600, 604-05 (5th Cir.2005). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *450 the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Gentry
432 F.3d 600 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 F. App'x 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-garza-ca5-2006.