United States v. Gary White
This text of 698 F. App'x 917 (United States v. Gary White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM *
1. “[T]he district court may not contradict an affirmative finding by the jury.” United States v. Pimentel-Lopez, 859 F.3d 1134, 1143 (9th Cir. 2016) (as amended). The district court here erred by sentencing White based on a higher drug weight than the jury found in its special verdict. See id. at 1140.
2. The district court also erred by relying on evidence outside the record without notifying White in advance. See United States v. Warr, 530 F.3d 1152, 1162-63 (9th Cir. 2008).
VACATED AND REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
698 F. App'x 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gary-white-ca9-2017.