United States v. Gary White

698 F. App'x 917
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 12, 2017
Docket16-50113
StatusUnpublished

This text of 698 F. App'x 917 (United States v. Gary White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gary White, 698 F. App'x 917 (9th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

1. “[T]he district court may not contradict an affirmative finding by the jury.” United States v. Pimentel-Lopez, 859 F.3d 1134, 1143 (9th Cir. 2016) (as amended). The district court here erred by sentencing White based on a higher drug weight than the jury found in its special verdict. See id. at 1140.

2. The district court also erred by relying on evidence outside the record without notifying White in advance. See United States v. Warr, 530 F.3d 1152, 1162-63 (9th Cir. 2008).

VACATED AND REMANDED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Warr
530 F.3d 1152 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Pimentel-Lopez
859 F.3d 1134 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
698 F. App'x 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gary-white-ca9-2017.