United States v. Gary Germany
This text of 529 F. App'x 853 (United States v. Gary Germany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Gary A. Germany appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of his custodial sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss.
Because Germany has finished serving his “term of imprisonment,” he is not eligible for relief under section 3582(c)(2). See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (allowing the district court to reduce the “term of imprisonment” when the defendant was sentenced based upon a sentencing range which has been subsequently lowered). Accordingly, we agree with the government that this case is moot. See United States v. Strong, 489 F.3d 1055, 1059 (9th Cir.2007).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
529 F. App'x 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gary-germany-ca9-2013.