United States v. Garland
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6880
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LARRY BEVERLY GARLAND,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:05-cr-00263-HEH)
Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 27, 2008
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Beverly Garland, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Larry Beverly Garland appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Garland, No. 3:05-cr-00263-HEH (E.D. Va.
Apr. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Garland (United States v. Garland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.