United States v. Garland

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2008·No. 08-6880·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6880

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LARRY BEVERLY GARLAND,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:05-cr-00263-HEH)

Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 27, 2008

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Beverly Garland, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Larry Beverly Garland appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Garland, No. 3:05-cr-00263-HEH (E.D. Va.

Apr. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Garland, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Garland (United States v. Garland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related