United States v. Garcia-Perez
This text of 72 F. App'x 716 (United States v. Garcia-Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Eulogio Garcia-Perez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) with a sentencing enhancement under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2).
Garcia-Perez’s contention, that the district court erred in refusing to depart downward based on his cultural assimilation, is not reviewable on appeal because the denial of the departure was a proper exercise of the district court’s discretion. United, States v. Wetchie, 207 F.3d 632, 636 (9th Cir.2000). We do not consider Garcia-Perez’s remaining contention, that he should have received a departure based on “saving to the government,” which he raises for the first time on appeal. United States v. Flores-Payon, 942 F.2d 556, 558 (9th Cir.1991).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 F. App'x 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-garcia-perez-ca9-2003.